Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Galaxy A35 5G, with a global score of 92.9 against 79.4. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, but it's just a little bit thicker and was released 4 years before. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A35 5G features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per display inch, a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display.
Galaxy A71 5G UW captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos and a much more mega pixels camera.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.