Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than Samsung Galaxy A50, with a 92.9 score against 83.8. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW design is newer, but somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A50. Samsung Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A71 5G UW both count with really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a much more mega pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A50. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A50, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.