Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A6's global score of 75.8. Although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy A6, it is heavier and a bit thicker. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a better pixels density, a bigger display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A6. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A6, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.