Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is a bit better than Galaxy F62, with a 92.9 score against 88.1. Even though Galaxy A71 5G UW and Galaxy F62 were only released 7 months apart, Galaxy A71 5G UW is somewhat lighter and thinner. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and Galaxy F62 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the same number of pixels in each inch of display and a same size display.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit better camera than Galaxy F62. Both of them have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same video frame rate, a back camera with a 64 MP resolution, the same aperture and the same (4K) video resolution. Galaxy F62 has slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 56% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.