Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is slightly better than the Galaxy A71 5G UW, with a global score of 93.4 against 92.9. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version and Galaxy A71 5G UW has Android 10. Galaxy S22's design is newer, lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy A71 5G UW.
Galaxy A71 5G UW and Galaxy S22 both feature similar processing units, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy S22 features a much sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy S22 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a lot lower resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is more expensive than the Galaxy A71 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A71 5G UW. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A71 5G UW, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.