Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-16 | -- |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.63 ounces | -- |
| Prism bricks black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, getting a 92.9 score against 90.7. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a little larger display, more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a lot larger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot more MP back camera and a larger camera aperture.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.