Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than the Samsung Galaxy S7, with a global score of 92.9 against 79.5. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy S7's, but it's somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S7, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera and a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy A71 5G UW, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy S7, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.