Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is much better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. The Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is notably newer and somewhat thinner than Galaxy S7 Active's, although it is also just a little heavier. Galaxy S7 Active has a sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.