Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is notably lighter and extremely thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both of them were only released 3 months apart. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G UW and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro both count with similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A71 5G UW takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way bigger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery life is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's battery life.
Galaxy A71 5G UW not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.