Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is somewhat thinner and lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro, although they were released only a couple of months apart.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a screen that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW one, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in low light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels, a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.