Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's general score of 88.5. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a just a little greater display pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.