Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is just a bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 3, getting a 92.9 score against 90.6. Both devices in this review work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11 version. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design is much lighter than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it is extremely thicker and was released a little bit more than a year before.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video and a much more mega pixels back camera. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.