Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-16 | -- |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's general score of 91.1. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a way thicker but noticeably lighter cellphone than the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1968 x 2184px and a larger screen. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with an extremely better processor than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a back camera with a way lower resolution, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.