Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting a global score of 92.9 against 79. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is somewhat heavier than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's extremely thinner and also newer.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xperia XZ2 Compact has a sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixel density.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a superior camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a larger aperture, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better memory for games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 57 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.