Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is way better than the Xperia XZs's 77.2 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW body is way newer than Xperia XZs's, but it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little faster processing unit than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xperia XZs counts with a display that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's display, because although the Xperia XZs has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Xperia XZs, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Xperia XZs takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a worse (4K) video resolution, a lot smaller sensor shooting way lower quality photos and videos, a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution and a tinier aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much longer battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2900mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.