Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's 87.9 overall score. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The Galaxy A71 5G UW body is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, even when both of them were released with only 2 months difference.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a higher pixels number per inch in the screen and a screen of the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have a 0.59 inches sensor and a 64 MP resolution back facing camera, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a way higher video definition.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.