Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T's general score of 78.2. These devices work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should offer identical operating system features. Even when the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and Xiaomi Redmi 9T were only released 6 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger screen. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back camera with a much better resolution, a lot better video quality and a bigger back camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.