Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having a 92.9 score against 78.2. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a just a bit heavier phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but both of them are equally thin. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both of them have a same resolution camera in the back and a same size aperture. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.