Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-16 | -- |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, having a overall score of 92.9 against 86.1. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a just a bit lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, but both are 0.33inches thick. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW both have extremely similar processors, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a better 2080 x 2400px resolution and a bit higher pixel number in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a back camera with lot less MP and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 15% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.