Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, with a general score of 92.9 against 77.2. The Galaxy A71 5G UW body has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, but it is a little bit heavier. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a greater camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a way higher (4K) video resolution and a lot bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.