Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is just a little thinner and just a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, although they were released with only 2 months difference. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a just a bit worse count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality, a way higher video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.