Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a general score of 92.9 against 81.1. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW design is lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, even when they were only released with a few months difference. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, a greater pixels count per screen inch and a display of the same size.
Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a camera with a 64 megapixels resolution, the same (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same camera sensor size, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a bigger camera aperture for better captures in low-light environments.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 12% larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.