Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, having a global score of 92.9 against 83. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is a bit lighter and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, although both were released only 6 months apart. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T feature similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixel count per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW takes a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and a camera with a much better resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.