Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A71's 87.5 global score. The iPhone X is a just a little lighter device than the Galaxy A71, but both are equally thin. The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a little bit higher display pixels density. Galaxy A71 has a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 takes greater photographs and videos than iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A71 counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 66% larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A71, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A71. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A71, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.