Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 has a global score of 87.5, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3's 80 score. Galaxy A71 is a newer and a little bit thinner phone than the Google Pixel 3, but it is also heavier. Google Pixel 3 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54 percent more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A71, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.