Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 has an overall score of 87.5, which is much better than HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A71 design is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner than the HTC U Ultra's, although it's also just a little heavier. The HTC U Ultra has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel count in each inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
HTC U Ultra features a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A71 features a bit faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 takes a lot better photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a back-facing camera with way more MP and a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality photographs.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A71 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.