Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is better than the LG G7 Fit, with a global score of 87.5 against 77. Samsung Galaxy A71 is a newer and a bit thinner phone than the LG G7 Fit, but it is heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has an older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The LG G7 Fit counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has just a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a lot better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a much larger camera sensor, a larger diafragm aperture and a much better resolution camera. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a much longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.