Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is better than LG K52, with a general score of 87.5 against 76. The Samsung Galaxy A71 is an older cellphone than LG K52, but Samsung was able to build it a bit thinner and just a little lighter. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has a more recent 11 version while LG K52 has Android 10 version, counting with a lot of extra features and performance enhancements.
The LG K52 and Galaxy A71 both have quite similar processing units, and although the LG K52 has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A71 counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG K52, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a quite bigger screen and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
LG K52 has a little bit better memory for apps and games than Galaxy A71, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A71 captures way better videos and photos than LG K52, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy A71 also has a way better video resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures and videos and a lot higher resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than LG K52, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.