Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Sky Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than the LG K62's 78.2 score. The Galaxy A71 body is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than LG K62, even though it was released just 10 months before. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 has a newer 11 version while LG K62 has Android 10, providing the user lots of additional features.
The LG K62's processing unit is very similar to the Galaxy A71 one, and although the LG K62 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a bit sharper display than LG K62, because it has a little larger screen, a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a better pixel amount per inch of display.
The Galaxy A71 takes much better photos and videos than LG K62, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 also has a camera with a way better resolution, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality. LG K62 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A71, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG K62 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features just a bit better battery performance than LG K62, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.