Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a bit better than LG K92, with an 87.5 score against 85.4. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A71 is older than LG K92, it's design is lighter and just a bit thinner. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has newer 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10, giving some extra features.
The Galaxy A71 features a bit faster processing unit than LG K92. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. LG K92 has a display that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A71's screen, both of them have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the same amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a display with the same size.
The LG K92 features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG K92 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a slightly better camera than LG K92, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a 64 mega pixels back camera, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a larger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
Galaxy A71 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 costs a little more than LG K92, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.