Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is slightly better than the LG V30S ThinQ's global score of 82.5. Samsung Galaxy A71's body is newer than LG V30S ThinQ's, but it's heavier and a little thicker. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has an older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A71. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel count in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A71, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A71 takes a lot better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy A71 counts with greater battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A71 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.