Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with a score of 87.5 against 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy A71 design is newer, but a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and more pixels per display inch.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A71, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A71 features superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 has a lot better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.