Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A71's global score of 87.5. LG V60 ThinQ's design is somewhat thicker and heavier than the Galaxy A71. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should count with identical OS features.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG V60 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a bit better pixels density and a quite larger screen.
LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ. Both of them have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rate, a 0.59 inches sensor, a back camera with a 64 mega-pixels and the same video definition.
The LG V60 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A71, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.