Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Mineral Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is slightly better than Motorola Edge (2022), with an 87.5 score against 84.7. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12. The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a noticeably older and a bit heavier phone than the Motorola Edge (2022), but Samsung made it just a little bit thinner anyway.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels per display inch. The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A71. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A71 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge (2022) features just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A71 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.