Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LTPS |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a global score of 87.5, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G's 81.5 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A71 is an older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G 5G, but Samsung was able to make it way thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 has 11 version and Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10 version.
Galaxy A71 has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 also has a higher amount of RAM. Moto G 5G counts with a screen that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A71's screen, they have a better number of pixels per inch of screen, a screen with the same size and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a bit more storage to install games and applications than Moto G 5G, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Moto G 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A71, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A71 captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.