Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Surfing blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is a bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, with a global score of 87.5 against 82.6. The Galaxy A71 design is lighter and thinner than Moto G 5G Plus, although they were released only 5 months apart. The Moto G 5G Plus has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A71, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a little better number of pixels in each inch of display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution.
Moto G 5G Plus features a CPU that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A71's processing unit, and although the Moto G 5G Plus has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 takes slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher 64 MP resolution back camera.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A71, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.