Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a global score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the Moto G200 5G's 86.2 global score. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 is older than the Moto G200 5G, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Motorola Moto G200 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM.
Moto G200 5G has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A71, because it has a little larger display, a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A71 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. Moto G200 5G counts with just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A71, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.