Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | -- |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has an overall score of 87.5, which is slightly better than the Moto G60s's global score of 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy A71 body is notably thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G60s. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Galaxy A71 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 and Motorola Moto G60s both feature really similar displays, although the Motorola Moto G60s also has a little bigger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bit more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A71 has a slightly better camera than Moto G60s, although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a 64 megapixels camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G60s counts with a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G60s also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G60s has just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.