Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Samsung Galaxy A71 is a extremely newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it is a bit heavier and a bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 features just a bit better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more 2.2 gigahertz cpu cores. Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixels density.
The Galaxy A71 captures much better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A71 also has a lot better resolution camera in the back. The Moto Z Force has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A71, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A71 features longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.