Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is much better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with an 87.5 score against 76.4. The Galaxy A71 is a incredibly newer cellphone than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but it is a bit heavier and a little bit thicker. Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video resolution, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy A71 has improved battery life than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 29% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.