Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a score of 87.5 against 77.4. The Galaxy A71 is a a lot newer phone than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it's extremely thicker and notably heavier. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels amount in each inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A71, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A71 has a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh. Samsung Galaxy A71 has a much better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs, a camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light situations.
Galaxy A71 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.