Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having an 87.5 score against 77.4. The Galaxy A71 body is much newer, but heavier and a lot thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a display that is very similar to Galaxy A71's display, because although the Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z2 Play features just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A71, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photographs or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.