Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is better than the Moto Z3, having an 87.5 score against 77.6. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A71's body is newer than the Moto Z3's, although it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
Moto Z3 counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a bit greater display pixel density. Motorola Moto Z3 has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A71, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a lot better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 also has a back camera with a lot higher resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Moto Z3 features just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A71, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a really longer battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 is more expensive than the Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.