Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is much better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, with a general score of 87.5 against 76.3. Although Galaxy A71 is newer than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, it's a little bit thicker and heavier. Moto Z3 Play features a display that's very similar to the display in Galaxy A71, because although the Moto Z3 Play has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels quantity per inch of display.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 also has more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A71 counts with a very superior camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A71 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.