Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 has an overall score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Zoom's general score of 80. The Galaxy A71 construction is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than Motorola One Zoom, although both of them were only released with a few months difference. Motorola One Zoom counts with a screen that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A71 one, because although the Motorola One Zoom has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A71 features more memory for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 takes slightly better photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a bigger camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a much better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy A71 features a little better battery performance than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is also cheaper than the Motorola One Zoom, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.