Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a overall score of 87.5 against 79.2. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. The Galaxy A71 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A71, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A71 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 10 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a 4% greater battery size. Samsung Galaxy A71 takes clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.