Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A71 construction is noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although they were released with only 4 months difference. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A71, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite lower pixels number per display inch, they both have a same size display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with better video frame rates, a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos and a much more megapixels camera.
The Galaxy A71 features a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
The Galaxy A71 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.