Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 87.5 score against 83.1. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, so it offers a couple nice extra features and increased performance. The Galaxy A71 is a somewhat lighter and thinner device than OPPO Find X2 Pro, although both of them were released only 3 months apart.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a better display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A71 counts with just a little better battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4260mAh.
The Galaxy A71 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rates, a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video and a tinier sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.