Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | -- |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with an 87.5 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy A71's body has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, but it's just a little bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A71 has a slightly better storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 has a superior battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 takes a bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a back facing camera with a 64 megapixels resolution and the same video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.