Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-01-31 | -- |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a bit better than Galaxy A34, having a overall score of 87.5 against 82.9. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has 11 version while Galaxy A34 has Android 13 version. Galaxy A34 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Samsung Galaxy A34 also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy A34 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A71, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 has a much better camera than Galaxy A34, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 also has a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.